What is Experiential Learning?

How Experiential learning is different from Traditional Learning? Which works better and why?

This story was originally published on https://www.academiaerp.com/experiential-learning-vs-traditional-learning-which-works-better-and-why/

The concept of experiential learning in higher education is becoming the topic of discussion lately. Nowadays, more and more colleges (some schools) have begun to accept this growing trend. The idea is quite simple and bypasses the typical learning process through experience or a “reflex to do”.

How does this work?

The process starts with a person performing a specific action and then sees the effect of the action in a situation.

The second step is to understand these effects if the same measures were taken and predicted under the same circumstances.

The third step is to understand the general principle under which the particular instance resides. When this general principle is understood, the final step is the application of the action under new circumstances.

The world is your class

It can be argued in favor of experiential learning that concepts that are difficult to understand in the classroom can be more easily accepted through real experiences.

Studies have shown that learning in the real world can be more effective as students adapt to the real world through careful observation and generalization. With this learning experience, you can:

Gain valuable experience in the field

Study and learn more globally and locally

Understand the importance of real-life experiences

Actively participate in a dynamic environment

Experiential VS Traditional

Today, schools and organizations involved in the education sector use a variety of methods that they believe will contribute to overall development. However, there is a clear distinction in the way these procedures are carried out.

Some are more concerned with the concept of experiential learning and individual development compared to traditional methods designed to develop each individual’s ability to meet measurable standards or the standards of an organization.

Read also: 5 Benefits of Adaptive Learning in Edification

Nevertheless, there are many differences between conventional or traditional learning and experience:

Academia ERP

Conclusion:

It is not surprising that the vast majority of education and training is still conventional and not experiential. This can sometimes be understandable, as the needs of an organization can be anticipated according to individual needs, both in terms of training and in terms of subsequent work. Here it can be argued that society is a little ignorant and “broken” in this regard.

It is difficult to deny the benefits of experiential learning. As, it can effectively address the personal development needs of young and old learners and improve self-esteem, self-responsibility, and maturity which are difficult to achieve with traditional and normative teaching methods.

This story was originally published on https://www.academiaerp.com/experiential-learning-vs-traditional-learning-which-works-better-and-why/

What do you think which learning method is more fruitful for this generation students?

Will traditional learning will become obsolete in the future?